This expertise is invaluable and irreplaceable. Editors select peer reviewers primarily because of their in-depth knowledge of the subject matter or methods of the work they are asked to evaluate. Their expert evaluations and recommendations guide editors in their decisions and ensure that published research is valid, rigorous, and credible. Peer reviewers play a vital role in scientific publishing. Any articles submitted to a special issue by Guest Editors are also handled confidentially by Associate Editors outside of the normal refereeing process of the special issue to ensure that the evaluation of these articles is completely objective. ![]() Like our Associate Editors, Guest Editors make recommendations and request and evaluate revisions, but only the Editors-in-Chief can make final decisions of accept or reject on any special issue article. ![]() The peer review process of any submission associated with a special issue is handled by Guest Editors who are responsible for assigning at least two referees to each article and evaluating the reviews. To be accepted, manuscripts submitted by editorial board members must meet the same quality standards as all other accepted submissions there is absolutely no special preference or consideration given to such submissions.Įarth Systems and Environment also publishes special issues. Earth Systems and Environment accepts manuscript submissions from its own editorial board members in cases in which the identities of the Associate Editor and referees handling the manuscript can remain fully confidential. When selecting reviewers, the editorial board seeks to avoid conflicts of interest and close associates of the authors, such as frequent collaborators, former advisees, or former advisors. Although Associate Editors are tasked with making recommendations on each submission that they handle and can request revisions as well, only the Editors-in-Chief can make a final decision to accept or reject an article. The reviewers handling a paper are all anonymous and are invited by the manuscript’s Associate Editors, who also remain anonymous and are selected by the Editors-in-Chief. For revisions of prior submissions, it is common for suggested major revisions to be re-evaluated by the original referees, but articles requiring only minor revisions are often only re-evaluated by the original Associate Editors and Editors-in-Chief. No article is accepted without two complete and final reviews. Manuscripts submitted to Earth Systems and Environment are usually reviewed by two referees selected from the relevant worldwide research community together with one Associate Editor. Although the Editors of Earth Systems and Environment strive for the most timely and efficient process for peer review, our over-arching goal is to provide substantive reviews to our authors along with constructive suggestions for improvements and clarifications when needed. Earth Systems and Environment follows a single-blind peer review process. Editors can also run a similarity report at any other point during the review process or post-publication. ![]() Editorial Procedure-additional information Peer Review ProcessĪfter technical checks and screening for English quality, all new submissions are automatically screened using CrossCheck within the editorial system to detect cases of suspected plagiarism. ![]() The peer review process for these articles is the same as the peer review process of the journal in general.Īdditionally, if a guest editor authors an article in their issue/collection, they will not handle the peer review process. This journal also publishes special/guest-edited issues. This journal follows a single-blind reviewing procedure. Editorial procedure Single-blind peer review
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |